Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

You are using software which is blocking our advertisements (adblocker).

As we provide the news for free, we are relying on revenues from our banners. So please disable your adblocker and reload the page to continue using this site.
Thanks!

Click here for a guide on disabling your adblocker.

Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

Investigating the impact of alternative substrates on plant growth

This study investigates the effects of substrate composition on root architecture, plant growth, and allelopathic secondary metabolites, specifically benzoxazinoids (BXs), in the rhizospheres of rye (Secale cereale L.) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.).

Given the complexities of root exudate analysis, including the influence of substrate on root morphology and exudation, the experiment compared plant growth and BX release in two substrates: glass microbeads and a mixture of clay beads and attapulgite. Rye, pigweed, and co-cultures of the two were grown under controlled conditions, with root and shoot parameters measured to assess substrate suitability. Additionally, UPLC-QTOF-MS was used to analyze BXs in rye and rye–pigweed co-cultures.

The results demonstrated that the clay bead and attapulgite mixture provided better growth conditions and was effective for BX extraction, making it a suitable substrate for studying allelopathy in controlled environments. The findings highlight the critical role of substrate composition in both plant development and the study of root exudates, with implications for better understanding of crop–weed interactions and allelopathy.

De Snyders, E.; Fauconnier, M.-L.; Canelle, P.; Wirth, J.; Gfeller, A. Impact of Alternative Substrates on Plant Growth and Root Exudates in Plant Interactions: A Study on Secale cereale L. and Amaranthus retroflexus L. Agronomy 2024, 14, 3000. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14123000

Source: MDPI

Publication date: